nanner:

I was concerned about slut shaming. But I’m not interested in reading a woman tearing other women down.

Not much analysis, then?

It was more I didn’t care for the analysis. I thought it was thin and hinged kind of on ‘you girls are going wild!’, though it did have a couple of salient points and I did like her chapter on Girls Going Wild. (Irony.)

I actually checked it back out of the library last week to look up a couple of her arguments again for a paper I’m working on. I haven’t gotten to it yet, but my opinion on it may change.

Advertisements